Links:
Part #1
Part #2
Part #3 <<<You are here
Part #4
In part #3 we are going to list every book of the New Testament in the order of the date it was probably written.
There is an ongoing debate among bible scholars regarding the dating of the books of the New Testament. Consider the Second Letter of Peter for example. Some scholars say it was written by Peter just a few years after Jesus died, while others say it was a forgery written by an unknown author more than one hundred years after the death of Jesus.
Part #1
Part #2
Part #3 <<<You are here
Part #4
In part #3 we are going to list every book of the New Testament in the order of the date it was probably written.
There is an ongoing debate among bible scholars regarding the dating of the books of the New Testament. Consider the Second Letter of Peter for example. Some scholars say it was written by Peter just a few years after Jesus died, while others say it was a forgery written by an unknown author more than one hundred years after the death of Jesus.
We should be wary of
scholars who opt for very early dates, however, because those scholars
are usually devout Christians with an ulterior motive. In order to give
the New Testament some authenticity, they have declared that the various
books were written by the people who actually witnessed the events that
occurred during the ministry of Jesus. In the case of Second Peter, for
example, they are convinced the book was written by the apostle Peter
himself - and since he is reputed to have died in 65AD, his letter must
have been written before that date; probably in 60AD. These devout
Christian scholars simply will not entertain the idea that the letter
could have been forged by another Christian in 160AD - even if there is
solid evidence suggesting that it was.
John A.T.
Robinson - Bishop of Woolwich, Dean of Trinity College, and New
Testament Scholar - has actually gone to the extreme and declared the every
book of the New Testament was written before 70AD. He produces no real
evidence for that claim, and he makes it for no other reason than to
convince himself that the stories about Jesus were written by actual
eyewitnesses. Hardly any other biblical scholar agrees with him.
The
debate will continue but here's my thoughts on the matter: Paul wrote
his letters to the various churches during the years 50AD to 60AD -
probably in this order:
1 Thessalonians
Galatians
Philemon
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Romans
Philippians
These
are the seven 'genuine' letters that scholars agree were written by
Paul. There are seven more Pauline letters (listed below) that are
regarded as forgeries.
Then, as Christianity began to
grow, the new converts began seeking more information about Jesus and
local preachers responded by writing new gospels:
Mark in 70AD
Matthew in 80AD
Luke in 90AD.
Acts in 90AD
During
the same period as these gospels were being written, there were other
Christians who wanted to push their own ideas onto the flock, and, in an
effort to get their writings accepted, they forged them in the name of
Paul. They are listed in the bible as letters written by Paul, but most
scholars agree that they are forgeries written years after Paul had
died.
2 Thessalonians
Colossians
Ephesians
Hebrews
Then,
in about 95AD the gospel of John appeared for the first time. It was
quite different from the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and
included all sorts of weird inventions - like the idea that Jesus had
existed since before the creation of the universe and that he was not
just the Son of God, but actually God himself.
Gospel of John
And
not long afterwards, in 100AD, another Christian took the ratbaggery to
a whole new level and wrote the truly idiotic Book of Revelation.
Revelation
These
new ideas caused major splits in the church and the old-time preachers
immediately retaliated with warnings about false prophets who preached a
false gospel. The book of Jude, for example is little more than that -
a warning against false teachers.
On the other hand, you can be sure that my list is accepted by very many scholars (including bible believing Christian scholars) so you wont be in the minority if you read the books in the order listed. And if you read them in that order, you will easily see (as described earlier) that the Jesus story is nothing more than a legend that grew and grew as the years passed by.
JudeAnd the book of First Peter was written at about the same time.
First PeterAs the dispute continued more books were written and once again the authors tried to gain some authority for their letters by releasing them in the name of the apostle Paul. One of the major themes (in 1 Timothy for example) was "beware of false prophets". These are the last three of the seven forgeries written in Paul's name:
1 TimothyAnd there was a final rush of books written in the second century AD:
2 Timothy
Titus
1 JohnBut don't forget that the dating of the New Testament will never be finalised and no matter when you decide a particular book was written, there will be plenty of bible scholars who will say you are wrong. Let me remind you, again, of Second Peter: it has been variously dated at anywhere from 60AD to 160AD.
2 John
3 John
Second Peter
James
On the other hand, you can be sure that my list is accepted by very many scholars (including bible believing Christian scholars) so you wont be in the minority if you read the books in the order listed. And if you read them in that order, you will easily see (as described earlier) that the Jesus story is nothing more than a legend that grew and grew as the years passed by.
No comments:
Post a Comment